<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Masked Mystery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/</link>
	<description>FROM THE DEEPEST CORNERS OF THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY LIBRARY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 11:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Breeden</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Breeden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leave it to Pratt&#039;s amazing staff to have the answer.  Kudos to Jeff Korman!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave it to Pratt&#8217;s amazing staff to have the answer.  Kudos to Jeff Korman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Facing the Masks&#8221;: Masked Mystery Solved &#171; underbelly</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Facing the Masks&#8221;: Masked Mystery Solved &#171; underbelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] week we reached out for help understanding a photograph, and wow, did we get it. Our photo from the Hughes Company collection traveled far and wide. The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week we reached out for help understanding a photograph, and wow, did we get it. Our photo from the Hughes Company collection traveled far and wide. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since none of them appear to have handkerchiefs in their front pockets, perhaps their handkerchiefs are what they are using to cover the lower parts of their faces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since none of them appear to have handkerchiefs in their front pockets, perhaps their handkerchiefs are what they are using to cover the lower parts of their faces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the time period and the lack of recording devices, is it possible that the black gentleman is having to identify the voice of one of the men in masks? What if something happened in which he only heard a voice but couldn&#039;t see a face, and to avoid incorrectly identifying a man by appearance alone the other gentleman wear masks to conceal their faces but not their voices? Perhaps this is the most optimistic possibility for a legal situation.

I think it is very likely that the platform has wheels underneath because the platform does not completely meet the floor. There appears to be about an 1/4 inch clearance. The bolts may just act as stoppers to keep the platform from moving much. Based on the scratch marks on the floor that appear to form in curves or circles, I&#039;m guessing that platform was moved around frequently, either on purpose or by accident. I cannot tell if the chairs have wheels, but the supports do not appear to be high enough off the floor to have wheels. Nevertheless, maybe the scars in the floors are due to the chairs. It is definitely a well-used floor badly in need of resurfacing.

Are the windows on the right leading to the outside or merely making activities visible between multiple rooms? The depth of the window boxes means either that the windows lead to the outside or are located in main supporting walls of the building. The door in the foreground on the right appears to be closing in a box of some sort which has windows. As part of the box, directly visible through the door window is a sill running perpendicular from the wall to meet the door frame. This section appears to contain another window because that section of glass is getting reflections from multiple directions. Is this box big enough to glass-in just one or two people or an entire jury, for example?

The wall at the back is only 3/4 or 4/5th&#039;s high and appears to divide another area where another chandelier hangs from the ceiling. Perhaps it was added after the building was in use? Why does the chandelier in the middle of the room have globes covering the light bulbs but the chandelier in the back is globeless? Back then light bulbs were prone to exploding and the globes would provide protection. I&#039;m not even sure the chandelier in the back is turned on, but if it is lit the bulbs are not providing that much light. It also appears that the photographer&#039;s light is providing more light than the chandelier in the middle of the room. The outline of the bulbs are visible. The light from behind the camera appears to be larger than a simple flash because it spreads across the back of the room fairly well. I would think such a photograph with that kind of lighting would have to lead to a staged situation, not likely a photograph taken impromptu.

As for the gentleman at the back and the telephone (I definitely think it is a telephone), you cannot see his feet/legs through the legs of the men who are masked. Instead, there appears to be a divider with inset wood panels, possibly a work desk or greeting desk. However, there appears to be a pole affixed to the floor, similar to the poles on the moving dais. Could that literally be one pole supporting a horizontal fixed bar in front of a judges bench? On the right side of the left door in the background, there appears to be a hole in the trim on the right side of the doorway. Could this hold a flag, for example? A judges bench would require a flag somewhere. The pole in the front may simply be a holder for a flagpole, as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the time period and the lack of recording devices, is it possible that the black gentleman is having to identify the voice of one of the men in masks? What if something happened in which he only heard a voice but couldn&#8217;t see a face, and to avoid incorrectly identifying a man by appearance alone the other gentleman wear masks to conceal their faces but not their voices? Perhaps this is the most optimistic possibility for a legal situation.</p>
<p>I think it is very likely that the platform has wheels underneath because the platform does not completely meet the floor. There appears to be about an 1/4 inch clearance. The bolts may just act as stoppers to keep the platform from moving much. Based on the scratch marks on the floor that appear to form in curves or circles, I&#8217;m guessing that platform was moved around frequently, either on purpose or by accident. I cannot tell if the chairs have wheels, but the supports do not appear to be high enough off the floor to have wheels. Nevertheless, maybe the scars in the floors are due to the chairs. It is definitely a well-used floor badly in need of resurfacing.</p>
<p>Are the windows on the right leading to the outside or merely making activities visible between multiple rooms? The depth of the window boxes means either that the windows lead to the outside or are located in main supporting walls of the building. The door in the foreground on the right appears to be closing in a box of some sort which has windows. As part of the box, directly visible through the door window is a sill running perpendicular from the wall to meet the door frame. This section appears to contain another window because that section of glass is getting reflections from multiple directions. Is this box big enough to glass-in just one or two people or an entire jury, for example?</p>
<p>The wall at the back is only 3/4 or 4/5th&#8217;s high and appears to divide another area where another chandelier hangs from the ceiling. Perhaps it was added after the building was in use? Why does the chandelier in the middle of the room have globes covering the light bulbs but the chandelier in the back is globeless? Back then light bulbs were prone to exploding and the globes would provide protection. I&#8217;m not even sure the chandelier in the back is turned on, but if it is lit the bulbs are not providing that much light. It also appears that the photographer&#8217;s light is providing more light than the chandelier in the middle of the room. The outline of the bulbs are visible. The light from behind the camera appears to be larger than a simple flash because it spreads across the back of the room fairly well. I would think such a photograph with that kind of lighting would have to lead to a staged situation, not likely a photograph taken impromptu.</p>
<p>As for the gentleman at the back and the telephone (I definitely think it is a telephone), you cannot see his feet/legs through the legs of the men who are masked. Instead, there appears to be a divider with inset wood panels, possibly a work desk or greeting desk. However, there appears to be a pole affixed to the floor, similar to the poles on the moving dais. Could that literally be one pole supporting a horizontal fixed bar in front of a judges bench? On the right side of the left door in the background, there appears to be a hole in the trim on the right side of the doorway. Could this hold a flag, for example? A judges bench would require a flag somewhere. The pole in the front may simply be a holder for a flagpole, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William J Earley</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>William J Earley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s a line up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a line up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A &#8220;Masked Mystery&#8221; at the Maryland Historical Society uncovered by blog readers</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>A &#8220;Masked Mystery&#8221; at the Maryland Historical Society uncovered by blog readers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to reverberate with Marylanders of today. One such entry recently got our attention entitled &#8220;Masked Mystery.&#8221; In the article, the author introduces a sinister-looking photograph from their archives [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to reverberate with Marylanders of today. One such entry recently got our attention entitled &#8220;Masked Mystery.&#8221; In the article, the author introduces a sinister-looking photograph from their archives [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe a criminal &quot;line up&quot; of sorts.  The black man is suspected of a crime; the men with the masks are witnesses to a crime who don&#039;t want the potential perp to see their faces. Could it be this is how line ups worked prior to mirrored glass?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a criminal &#8220;line up&#8221; of sorts.  The black man is suspected of a crime; the men with the masks are witnesses to a crime who don&#8217;t want the potential perp to see their faces. Could it be this is how line ups worked prior to mirrored glass?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariann Regan</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariann Regan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t have any more clues than those I&#039;ve read above. I just know that this photo gives me a sickening feeling. I also have heard that the 1920s was a decade of many lynchings in this country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any more clues than those I&#8217;ve read above. I just know that this photo gives me a sickening feeling. I also have heard that the 1920s was a decade of many lynchings in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Korman, Maryland Department manager</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Korman, Maryland Department manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This photograph appears in the book, History of the Baltimore Police Department, 1774-1909 by Clinton McCabe. It can be found on page xvii in a supplement that updates McCabe’s original work, which covered up to 1907. The caption reads “The white masks” inspecting a prisoner at detective headquarters. The photo had to have been taken after January 1 1907 and before January 1 1909.
Regarding the masks: detectives never allowed their face to be shown in public. McCabe wrote this at the end of the updated chapter:
“At the request of the Board of Police Commissioners the photographs of all members of the Detectives Department published in this revised edition have been stamped with a gilt mask. This is but following the policy of the Commissioners that the faces of the men who are engaged in police secret service not be familiar to the general public….”

So the masks were used to hide the identity of the detectives. Those not wearing masks must no be part of that department. And, yes, in the book all of the photos of detectives have a gold stamp over their face.

The Maryland Department at the Pratt Library/Maryland’s State Library on Cathedral Street has copies of this book that can be viewed by the public at any time. Ask for this call number: Md. XHV8148.B21M2]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This photograph appears in the book, History of the Baltimore Police Department, 1774-1909 by Clinton McCabe. It can be found on page xvii in a supplement that updates McCabe’s original work, which covered up to 1907. The caption reads “The white masks” inspecting a prisoner at detective headquarters. The photo had to have been taken after January 1 1907 and before January 1 1909.<br />
Regarding the masks: detectives never allowed their face to be shown in public. McCabe wrote this at the end of the updated chapter:<br />
“At the request of the Board of Police Commissioners the photographs of all members of the Detectives Department published in this revised edition have been stamped with a gilt mask. This is but following the policy of the Commissioners that the faces of the men who are engaged in police secret service not be familiar to the general public….”</p>
<p>So the masks were used to hide the identity of the detectives. Those not wearing masks must no be part of that department. And, yes, in the book all of the photos of detectives have a gold stamp over their face.</p>
<p>The Maryland Department at the Pratt Library/Maryland’s State Library on Cathedral Street has copies of this book that can be viewed by the public at any time. Ask for this call number: Md. XHV8148.B21M2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Boessenecker</title>
		<link>http://www.mdhs.org/underbelly/2013/02/07/masked-mystery/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>John Boessenecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdhslibrary.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am the author of numerous books on crime and law enforcement in the American frontier, and also a long time collector of antique photography connected with that topic.  As soon as I saw the image, I noted that it was obviously a police show-up (like a one-man lineup) with the witnesses wearing masks to protect their identities.  The clothing dates from about 1910, not 1900 and not 1920 as stated in the story.  The photo is posed, what we would call a reenactment today. Then I scrolled down and saw the post from Bill Lefurgy who specifically identifies the photo from a contemporary 1908 Baltimore newspaper account.  Mr. Lefurgy is absolutely correct.  The real issue here is why the image, according to the story, &quot;evokes such strong feelings, conjuring up images of Jim Crow, the Klan, and lynching,&quot;  Of course, the image has nothing to do with lynching.   Our country&#039;s historical  treatment of African Americans is bad enough without embellishment.  Failure to understand the past does not help us understand the present.  John Boessenecker, San Francisco, CA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the author of numerous books on crime and law enforcement in the American frontier, and also a long time collector of antique photography connected with that topic.  As soon as I saw the image, I noted that it was obviously a police show-up (like a one-man lineup) with the witnesses wearing masks to protect their identities.  The clothing dates from about 1910, not 1900 and not 1920 as stated in the story.  The photo is posed, what we would call a reenactment today. Then I scrolled down and saw the post from Bill Lefurgy who specifically identifies the photo from a contemporary 1908 Baltimore newspaper account.  Mr. Lefurgy is absolutely correct.  The real issue here is why the image, according to the story, &#8220;evokes such strong feelings, conjuring up images of Jim Crow, the Klan, and lynching,&#8221;  Of course, the image has nothing to do with lynching.   Our country&#8217;s historical  treatment of African Americans is bad enough without embellishment.  Failure to understand the past does not help us understand the present.  John Boessenecker, San Francisco, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.301 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-08-12 11:13:38 -->